Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Apr;60(4):498–504. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.60.4.498

Table 3.

Mixed-models analyses of continuous outcome measures for 85 veterans assigned to a money manager or to a control intervention

Controla (N=41)
Money manager (N=44)
Group
Week
Group × week
Outcome M SD M SD Estimate z p Estimate z p Estimate z p Nb
Addiction Severity Index follow-up scorec
 Drug composite .07 .07 .06 .07 −.004 −.46 ns −.002 −4.86 <.001 .001 2.86 .004 489
 Alcohol composite .18 .17 .24 .18 −.05 −2.15 .03 −.003 −3.60 <.001 .003 2.44 .015 489
Spent in past 30 days on drugs and alcohol ($) 46.80 162.41 60.15 212.29 −64.4 −1.69 .09 −5.02 −3.39 <.001 3.30 1.58 ns 489
Global Assessment of Functioning scored 58.4 12.4 57.4 12.4 −.40 −.26 ns .10 1.59 ns .04 .44 ns 457
a

Percentage of ratings during follow-up period by control group participants without use of substance indicated

b

Number of observations used in the analysis

c

Higher (more positive) group coefficients of composite measures indicate more severe problems in the control group. Possible composite scores range from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating more severe problems.

d

Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning.