Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Hypertens. 2009 Sep 24;22(12):1235–1241. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2009.156

Table 4.

Association between pulse wave analysis parameters and carotid plaque

PWA variable Plaque absent Plaque present P value χ2 Unadjusted odds
ratio for the presence
of plaque
Adjusted odds ratio
for the presence
of plaque
Additionally
adjusted for
β-blockers
C_SP <125 107 (44%) 136 (56%) 0.10
≥125 40 (34.8%) 75 (65.2%) 1.48 (0.93–2.34) 1.32 (0.8–2.18) 1.24 (0.75–2.07)
AI <30% 105 (46.7%) 120 (53.3%) 0.01
≥30% 42 (32.1%) 89 (67.9%) 1.85 (1.18–2.91) 1.44 (0.87–2.36) 1.35 (0.81–2.23)
C_PP <45 105 (51.2%) 100 (48.8%) <0.0001
≥45 42 (27.8%) 109 (72.2%) 2.72 (1.74–4.27) 1.87 (1.14–3.06) 1.77 (1.07–2.92)
AMPR <1.3 66 (38.2%) 107 (61.8%) 0.21
≥1.3 81 (44.8%) 100 (55.2%) 0.76 (0.5–1.16) 1.19 (0.74–1.92) 1.25 (0.77–2.03)
BR_PP ≥55 97 (50.8%) 94 (49.2%) <0.0001
>55 50 (30.3%) 115 (69.7%) 2.37 (1.53–3.67) 1.78 (1.1–2.88) 1.69 (1.03–2.75)

Odds ratio adjusted for age, gender, and race. Diabetes, hypertension, hemoglobin, parathyroid hormone, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides were included in the initial model but were not significant.

AI, augmentation index; AMPR, amplification ratio; BR_PP, brachial pulse pressure; C_PP, central pulse pressure; C_SP, central aortic systolic pressure; PWA, pulse wave analysis.