Skip to main content
. 2010 Spring;43(1):19–33. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-19

Table 1.

Training Sequence

graphic file with name jaba-43-01-02-t01.jpg

Condition Phase Sample/correct comparison All comparisons
A→B training 1 A1→B1 and A2→B2 B1 and B2
2 A3→B3 and A4→B4 B3 and B4
3 A1→B1 and A2→B2 B1, B2, B3, B4
A3→B3 and A4→B4
A→C training 1 A1→C1 and A2→C2 C1 and C2
2 A3→C3 and A4→C4 C3 and C4
3 A1→C1 and A2→C2 C1, C2, C3, C4
A3→C3 and A4→C4
A→D training 1 A1→D1 and A2→D2 D1 and D2
2 A3→D3 and A4→D4 D3 and D4
3 A1→D1 and A2→D2 D1, D2, D3, D4
A3→D3 and A4→D4
A→E training 1 A1→E1 and A2→E2 E1 and E2
2 A3→E3 and A4→E4 E3 and E4
3 A1→E1 and A2→E2 E1, E2, E3, E4
A3→E3 and A4→E4

Note. This table displays the trials that were presented in each phase of the study. For each type of relation (e.g., A→B, A→C) participants began MTS training with stimuli from Sets 1 and 2. Following mastery, participants completed training with Sets 3 and 4 followed by a phase with all four sets of stimuli presented (see Figure 1 for description of the stimuli).