Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 25;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-4

Table 2.

Validity characteristics of included studies

Random-isation Described/Allocation Concealment Researcher/Outcome Assessor/Participants Masked to intervention Change in iron status OR 12+ wks?* All those randomised included in outcomes?/Reason for dropouts reported? Potential for funding bias** Study data useable in meta-analysis?
Beard 2005 Partially/Unclear Unclear/Unclear/Yes Yes (SF, 29 wks) No/Partially Moderate Yes

Bruner 1996 Yes/Unclear Yes/Unclear/Yes Yes (Hb & SF) No/Yes High No (no raw data, only regression)

Elwood 1970 No/Unclear Unclear/Yes/Yes Unclear (p-values not presented) No/Partially High Yes

Gopaldas 1985 Partially/Unclear No/No/Yes Anaemic & Iron repl: Yes (Hb) Yes/Yes (no drop-outs) High Yes

Groner 1986 No/Unclear Yes/Yes/Yes Yes (Hb) No/Yes Moderate Yes

Kashyap 1987 Partially/Unclear Unclear/Unclear/Yes Anaemic & Iron repl: Yes (Hb, 17 wks) No/Partially Moderate Yes

Kordas 2005 Yes/Unclear Yes/Yes/Yes Yes (21 wks) No/Partially Moderate No (only z-scores)

Lambert 2002 No/Unclear Yes/Unclear/Yes Yes (SF, not Hb) No/No Moderate No (no variance data)

Lynn & Harland 1998 Yes/Unclear Yes/Yes/Yes Iron Defic & Iron repl: Yes (16 wks) Unclear/No High Yes

Murray-Kolb 2007 Yes/Unclear No/Yes/Yes Anaemic & Iron repl: Yes (SF, not Hb, 16 wks),Iron defic: No (not SF or Hb) No/Partially Moderate No (reported only as z-scores)

Pollitt 1989 No/Unclear Unclear/Unclear/Yes Anaemic, Iron defic & Iron repl: Yes (Hb, SF, 16 wks) No/No Moderate Yes

Soemantri 1985 No/Unclear Unclear/Unclear/Unclear Anaemic: Yes (Hb, 13 wks)
Iron repl: No (Hb)
Unclear/No Moderate No (no variance or SD data)

Soemantri 1989 No/Unclear Unclear/Unclear/Yes Anaemic & Iron repl: Yes (Hb, 13 wks) No/No Moderate Yes

Sungthong 2004 Yes/Yes Yes/Yes/Yes Yes (SF & Hb, 16 wks) No/Yes Low Yes

* Iron status was said to have changed if there were statistically significant differences in Hb or SF between iron and placebo groups at the end of the study or, where no data were provided, if the intervention period was at least 12 weeks long.

** Potential for funding bias was assessed as follows: low (when funders were clearly not industry-related, no authors worked for industry and there was no suggestion that products were donated by industry); high (when non-industry funding was reported, or when funding was not mentioned); moderate in all other studies.