Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nano Today. 2009 Dec;4(6):470–481. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2009.10.007

Table 1.

Summary of the comparison among the conventional 96-well approach and the two generations of screening microreactors.

Number of
reactions
Enzyme
(bCAII) (µg)
Alkyne
(nmol)
Azide
(nmol)
Total reaction
volume (µL)
Sample
preparation time
Hit identification
time
Detction
methods
96 well 96 94 6 40 100 few mins few mins LC-MS
1st-Generation 32 19 2.4 3.6 4 58 sec 58 sec LC-MS
2nd-Generation 1024 0.36 0.12 0.12 0.4 15 sec 15 sec MRM