Skip to main content
. 1997 Dec 9;94(25):13431–13436. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13431

Table 1.

Fractional factorial folding screen

No.a Patternb Conditions
Analysis
Protein, mg/ml pH IS,c mM Td Divalentse Polar additive Nonpolar additive,f % Chaotrope Reduced/oxidizedg Detergent,h mM Ligand,i mM PEG,j % SDS/PAGEk SEC,l % Ligand bindingm
1 −+−++−+−−+−+ 0.1 8.5 10 20 Mg, Ca None 21 None DTT 5.0 None 0.05 1.0 782
2 +++−−−−−−−−+ 1.0 8.5 250 4 EDTA None None None DTT None None 0.05 ++ 6.0 8318
3 −+++−+−+−+−− 0.1 8.5 250 20 EDTA 0.5 M Arg None 0.75 M Gdn⋅HCl DTT 5.0 None None ++ <0.1 <200
4 −+−−−+−++−++ 0.1 8.5 10 4 EDTA 0.5 M Arg None 0.75 M Gdn⋅HCl GSH:GSSG None 10.0 0.05 + <0.1 <200
5 +−+−++−−++−− 1.0 6.0 250 4 Mg, Ca 0.5 M Arg None None GSH:GSSG 5.0 None None 1.0 <200
6 +−++−−++−−+− 1.0 6.0 250 20 EDTA None 21 0.75 M Gdn⋅HCl DTT None 10.0 None 0.4 <200
7 ++++++++++++ 1.0 8.5 250 20 Mg, Ca 0.5 M Arg 21 0.75 M Gdn⋅HCl GSH:GSSG 5.0 10.0 0.05 0.8 <200
8 −−−−+−−+−++− 0.1 6.0 10 4 Mg, Ca None None 0.75 M Gdn⋅HCl DTT 5.0 10.0 None + 4.0 2891
9 +−−+++−−−−++ 1.0 6.0 10 20 Mg, Ca 0.5 M Arg None None DTT None 10.0 0.05 0.6 <200
10 −−+−−++−−+++ 0.1 6.0 250 4 EDTA 0.5 M Arg 21 None DTT 5.0 10.0 0.05 + 3.0 <200
11 −−+++−−++−−+ 0.1 6.0 250 20 Mg, Ca None None 0.75 M Gdn⋅HCl GSH:GSSG None None 0.05 <0.1 <200
12 +−−−−−++++−+ 1.0 6.0 10 4 EDTA None 21 0.75 M Gdn⋅HCl GSH:GSSG 5.0 None 0.05 1.0 <200
13 ++−−++++−−−− 1.0 8.5 10 4 Mg, Ca 0.5 M Arg 21 0.75 M Gdn⋅HCl DTT None None None ++ 5.0 5490
14 ++−+−−−−+++− 1.0 8.5 10 20 EDTA None None None GSH:GSSG 5.0 10.0 None 0.3 <200
15 −++−+−+−+−+− 0.1 8.5 250 4 Mg, Ca None 21 None GSH:GSSG None 10.0 None ++ 8.0 6183
16 −−−+−++−+−−− 0.1 6.0 10 20 EDTA 0.5 M Arg 21 None GSH:GSSG None None None <0.1 <200
a

Solution number. 

b

Pattern of factor levels. 

c

Ionic strength, molar ratio of NaCl to KCl was 25:1. 

d

Temperature in °C. 

e

MgCl2, CaCl2 concentrations were 2 mM; EDTA concentration was 1.0 mM. 

f

The nonpolar additive was composed of 20% glycerol (v/v) and 1% sucrose (w/v). 

g

Concentration of DTT was 1.0 mM, and the concentrations of reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) glutathione were 1.0 and 0.1 mM, respectively. 

h

1,2-Diheptanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phorphocholine. 

i

l-Glutamate. 

j

PEG MWave = 3350 Da, and the concentration was w/v. 

k

Protein concentration in the supernatant following dialysis against refolding buffers and centrifugation at 128,000 × g for 30 min (4°C) was estimated by SDS/PAGE. − corresponds to <0.1 μg or to <3% yield of water-soluble HS1S2; “+” and “++” correspond to ∼10 and ∼20% yields of water-soluble HS1S2, respectively. 

l

Folding yield estimated by integration of monomer peak from SEC chromatogram. 

m

The units are cpm. [3H]AMPA (20 nM, 10.6 Ci/mmol) and 2 or 20 μl of each refolding mixture with an initial protein concentration of 1.0 or 0.1 mg/ml, respectively, were used to measure specific ligand binding as described in Materials and Methods