Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 4.
Published in final edited form as: Econ Dev Cult Change. 2009 Apr;57(3):439–477. doi: 10.1086/596614

Table 4.

Proportion attriting by 2003 of original ENCASEH sample: individuals aged 0 to 8 years in 1997

Treatment
(T1998)
Control
(T1999)
P>|Z|
N Mean N Mean
A. Total proportion attriting (individual or household)
0 to 8 years (all) 19,493 0.232 12,055 0.229 0.564
0 to 8 years (eligible) 14,610 0.205 8,783 0.199 0.236
By gender
Boys 0 to 8 years (eligible) 7,434 0.203 4,393 0.203 0.993
Girls 0 to 8 years (eligible) 7,168 0.208 4,378 0.194 0.068
B. Proportion due to individual attrition
0 to 8 years (all) 0.052 0.050 0.504
0 to 8 years (eligible) 0.041 0.045 0.238
By gender
Boys 0 to 8 years (eligible) 0.038 0.045 0.096
Girls 0 to 8 years (eligible) 0.045 0.044 0.961
C. Proportion due to household attrition
(individual not found because household -HH- moves)
0 to 8 years (all) 0.181 0.180 0.802
0 to 8 years (eligible) 0.164 0.154 0.051
By gender
Boys 0 to 8 years (eligible) 0.165 0.158 0.375
Girls 0 to 8 years (eligible) 0.163 0.149 0.047

Notes: The last column gives the significance level for mean differences between T1998 and T1999 based on t-tests.Source: Authors’ calculations with 1997 ENCASEH and 2003 ENCEL data.