Table 2.

Parenting outcomes involving micro-level intervention differences from baseline to 2-year follow-up

Outcome	Tests of hypotheses involving the micro effect				Adjusted M (SE)
	Time × Micro × Macro Interaction	Micro × Macro Interaction	Time by Micro Interaction	Micro Main Effect	Micro intervention	No micro intervention
Limit setting of diet and PA	ns	ns	ns	ns
Monitoring of diet and PA	ns	ns	ns	.014	4.01 (.051)	3.87 (.048)
Discipline for diet and PA	ns	ns	ns	ns
Control of diet and PA	ns	ns	ns	≤.001	2.34 (.072)	2.65 (.067)
Reinforcement for diet and PA	.012	ns	ns	.002	4.13 (.065)	3.92 (.061)
Parental support for PA	ns	ns	ns	≤.001	3.82 (.079)	3.45 (.073)
Away from home foods	ns	ns	ns	.045	0.74 (.077)	0.91 (.072)
Family watches TV during dinner	ns	ns	ns	.006	2.59 (.066)	2.77 (.062)
Parent gives money for snacks	ns	ns	ns	ns
Number of family meals together	ns	ns	ns	ns
Parent- perceived barriers	ns	ns	ns	ns
Parent- perceived self- efficacy	ns	ns	ns	ns

ns = not significant at ≤ .05. All tests were carried out using mixed effects models. The models accounted for repeated measures over M2 to M4 and adjusted for the M1 (baseline) level. All models adjusted for clustering at the school level and for language version of survey, parent gender and age, marital status, household size, employment status, education status, homeowner, household income, and child gender, age and generation status.