Table 2.
Outcome | Tests of hypotheses involving the micro effect | Adjusted M (SE) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time × Micro × Macro Interaction |
Micro × Macro Interaction |
Time by Micro Interaction |
Micro Main Effect |
Micro intervention |
No micro intervention |
|
Limit setting of diet and PA |
ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
Monitoring of diet and PA |
ns | ns | ns | .014 | 4.01 (.051) | 3.87 (.048) |
Discipline for diet and PA |
ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
Control of diet and PA |
ns | ns | ns | ≤.001 | 2.34 (.072) | 2.65 (.067) |
Reinforcement for diet and PA |
.012 | ns | ns | .002 | 4.13 (.065) | 3.92 (.061) |
Parental support for PA |
ns | ns | ns | ≤.001 | 3.82 (.079) | 3.45 (.073) |
Away from home foods |
ns | ns | ns | .045 | 0.74 (.077) | 0.91 (.072) |
Family watches TV during dinner |
ns | ns | ns | .006 | 2.59 (.066) | 2.77 (.062) |
Parent gives money for snacks |
ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
Number of family meals together |
ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
Parent- perceived barriers |
ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
Parent- perceived self- efficacy |
ns | ns | ns | ns |
ns = not significant at ≤ .05. All tests were carried out using mixed effects models. The models accounted for repeated measures over M2 to M4 and adjusted for the M1 (baseline) level. All models adjusted for clustering at the school level and for language version of survey, parent gender and age, marital status, household size, employment status, education status, homeowner, household income, and child gender, age and generation status.