Skip to main content
. 2009 Fall;31(1):35–50.

Table 5. Predications of Mean Cost Attributable to Cancera.

All ($) Medicare Only ($) Dually Eligible ($) Difference ($) [95%CI]b
All patients 29196 29342 28070 1272c [−357, 2569]
Stage of Cancer
In situ/local 27551 27458 28063 −605 [−3866, 2126]
Regional 30748 30993 28943 2050c [−341, 4109]
Distant 29933 30326 26992 3335c [−64, 6438]
Procedure
None or Chemo 14696 14760 14276 483 [−2246, 3376]
Resection alone 28703 28822 27922 900 [−1074,2468]
Resection + Chemo 42523 42860 40322 2538 [−970, 6073]
Comorbidity
0 25205 25329 24220 1109c [−143,2167]
1 27967 28110 26830 1280c [−288, 2532]
2 28300 28465 26985 1480 [−573, 3044]
3+ 32922 33125 31294 1832 [−1297,4273]
Stage of Cancer × Procedure
In situ/local × None or Chemo 10920 10844 11403 −560 [−3309, 1909]
In situ/local × Resection alone 27225 27105 27983 −878 [−4390, 1806]
In situ/local × Resection + Chemo 41426 41431 41403 28 [−5867, 4994]
Regional × None or Chemo 18101 18233 17238 995 [−2839, 4583]
Regional × Resection alone 30308 30543 28775 1768 [−1155, 4141]
Regional × Resection + Chemo 41624 42095 38540 3555d [182, 6677]
Distant × None or Chemo 15332 15546 13908 1638 [−1519, 4578]
Distant × Resection alone 27925 28300 25423 2877c [−644, 6166]
Distant × Resection + Chemo 45886 46634 40895 5740d [223, 11000]
Stage of Cancer × Comorbidity
In situ/local × 0 21583 21523 21960 −437 [−2734, 1542]
In situ/local × 1 23207 23141 23615 −474 [−2999, 1732]
In situ/local × 2 23272 23204 23685 −481 [−3002, 1730]
In situ/local × 3+ 24239 24159 24683 −524 [−3295, 1779]
Regional × 0 27602 27789 26104 1685c [−296, 3439]
Regional × 1 25916 29971 27939 2032c [−303, 4165]
Regional × 2 28210 28467 26162 2305c [−409, 4813]
Regional × 3+ 33611 33969 30756 3213c [−677, 6666]
Distant × 0 28090 28408 25557 2851d [12,5546]
Distant × 1 28522 28885 25635 3250c [−76, 6322]
Distant × 2 30367 30816 26787 4030c [−198, 7838]
Distant × 3+ 25594 26103 21540 4563c [−452, 9088]
a

Recycled prediction approach was used except for the prediction for all patients (first row, first column).

b

Bootstrap bias-corrected confidence intervals are used for testing equality in costs between Medicare only and dually eligible patients. 1,000 cluster bootstrapped samples were used where each cancer patient and the controls were considered one cluster in bootstrapping.

c

The tests between Medicare only and the dually eligible patients were significant at p<0.1 using normal-based bootstrap confidence intervals.

d

The tests between Medicare only and the dually eligible patients were significant at p<0.05 using normal-based bootstrap confidence intervals.

SOURCE: Michigan Tumor Resigtry, Medicare and Medicaid fee-for-service claims from 1996 to 2000.