. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 4.

Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2008;103(482):705–713. doi: 10.1198/016214508000000364

Table 1.

Achieved significance level of our method for two-sided test of equality of partial areas under the curves (pAUC_{(p₁, p₂)}) (nominal level =.05)

		Achieved significance level
(ρ, λ)	(n_D, n_H)	pAUC_(.05,.35)	pAUC_(.05,.55)	pAUC_(.05,.95)
(0, 0)	(30, 30)	.07	.07	.06
	(50, 50)	.06	.05	.05
	(100, 100)	.05	.05	.06
(.25,.5)	(30, 30)	.05	.05	.04
	(50, 50)	.04	.05	.05
	(100, 100)	.04	.06	.04
(.50,.75)	(30, 30)	.05	.05	.06
	(50, 50)	.05	.04	.04
	(100, 100)	.05	.04	.04
(.75,.75)	(30, 30)	.05	.05	.06
	(50, 50)	.04	.04	.04
	(100, 100)	.04	.05	.05

NOTE: ρ and λ are measures of the within-subject and between-marker correlations, and (n_D, n_H) are the number of clusters for diseased and healthy subjects.