Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Aging Res. 2009 Jul–Sep;35(3):317–326. doi: 10.1080/03610730902922119

Table 1.

Sample characteristics, DRS and letter fluency performance

Cognitively Impaired (N = 20) Control (N = 40)
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Age (years) 85.1 (6.33) 84.4 (4.74)
Education (years)** 12.7 (2.15) 14.9 (2.20)
% Female 65% 62.5%
DRS: Total Score** 118.3 (3.92) 134.4 (6.10)
DRS: Attention 35.4 (1.43) 35.9 (1.07)
DRS: I/P** 27.8 (4.05) 34.5 (2.88)
DRS: Construction* 5.2 (1.01) 5.7 (0.79)
DRS: Conceptualization** 31.5 (3.12) 36.2 (2.42)
DRS: Memory** 18.5 (3.38) 22.1 (2.53)
Letter Fluency 1 minute* 8.25 (2.4) 10.4 (3.4)
Letter Fluency 2 minutes** 10.60 (3.4) 15.9 (5.9)
*

p ≤ .05

**

p ≤ .01

DRS denotes Dementia Rating Scale. LF denotes letter fluency; LF 1 minute = total number of words generated in the first minute of administration; LF 2 minutes = total number of words generated in two minutes of administration; I/P denotes Initiation/Perseveration. Independent-samples t tests (df = 58) were used to examine group differences on all continuous measures. Chi-square analysis was used to examine group differences in gender distribution.