Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 8;76(5):1471–1479. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02072-09

TABLE 3.

Mean contribution of the major T-RFs found in the soybean nodule surface samples, in each of the six data sets, for both inoculated treatments sampled at both time points

RE Major T-RF length (nt) % Hup+ (n = 3) % Hup (n = 3) Fold difference between Hup and Hup+ Phylogenetic affiliation (putative genus)a
BstUI 93 7.7 14.1 1.8 Mesorhizobium/Rhizobium
95 9.4 15.1 1.6 Sphingopyxis
97 6.2 11.8 1.9 Bradyrhizobium
220 2.4 10.9 4.5 Mycobacterium
223 6.6 6.8 1.0 Kribbella
HaeIII 65 3.6 10.5 2.9 Mycobacterium
189 5.8 9.4 1.6 Rhizobium
194 16.2 17.9 1.1 Bradyrhizobium
224 13.9 11.6 0.8 Mesorhizobium
226 23.0 10.5 0.5 Paenibacillus
292 12.2 17.3 1.4 Sphingopyxis
HhaI 59 2.9 5.4 1.9 Mesorhizobium
80 5.8 7.0 1.2 Sphingopyxis
206 12.4 17.1 1.4 ND
338 3.4 6.3 1.9 Rhizobium
365 2.8 20.8 7.4 Mycobacterium
472 14.9 22.1 1.5 Bradyrhizobium
HinfI 99 2.6 3.3 1.3 Mesorhizobium
101 4.2 6.5 1.5 Sphingopyxis
166 1.0 7.0 7.0 Mycobacterium
321 7.3 6.8 0.9 ND
472 13.4 10.9 0.8 Bradyrhizobium
MspI 126 1.4 4.8 3.4 Mesorhizobium/Rhizobium
151 4.1 11.3 2.8 Bradyrhizobium
160 2.9 3.5 1.2 ND
170 0.3 9.5 31.7 Mycobacterium
399 2.9 11.7 4.0 ND
Sau96I 64 2.0 9.0 4.5 Mycobacterium
164 4.2 8.3 2.0 Sphingopyxis
189 27.7 14.8 0.5 Rhizobium
192 9.8 13.2 1.3 Bradyrhizobium
289 8.2 9.1 1.1 Mesorhizobium
291 3.4 5.6 1.6 ND
317 5.6 2.7 0.5 ND
a

Phylogenetic affiliation by genus is given if it was able to be determined from the sequences in the parallel clone library. “ND” indicates that a phylogenetic affiliation was not able to be determined from the predicted T-RFs within 1 nt of the clone library sequences obtained.