Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 23;48(3):952–956. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01860-09

TABLE 3.

Comparison by laboratory test site of MICs for six antimicrobial agents incubated in ambient air and CO2 atmospheric conditions for 39 Brucella isolatesa

Antimicrobial agent Incubation condition Test site No. of occurrences at indicated MIC (μg/ml)
0.03 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16
Doxycycline AA A 3 26 2
B 13 20 2
C 9 23 2
CO2 A 26 11 2
B 18 13 4 3 1
D 3 17 10 7 1 1
Gentamicin AA A 1 16 14
B 21 14
C 1 19 15
CO2 A 1 2 19 16 1
B 1 23 15
D 1 3 22 13
Rifampin AA A 1 3 19 7
B 3 21 11
C 1 9 16 9
CO2 A 6 32 1
B 1 5 19 14
D 1 6 15 16 1b
Streptomycin AA A 1 12 18
B 9 24 2
C 6 25 4
CO2 A 14 15 10
B 3 35 1
D 1 18 16 4
Tetracycline AA A 8 22 1
B 1 24 10
C 8 27
CO2 A 28 11
B 21 13 5
D 1 3 17 16 2
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazolec AA A 3 24 4
B 18 17
C 2 17 16
CO2 A 9 27 3
B 1 15 18 5
D 4 24 9 2
a

For site A, ambient air (AA) data were available for only 31 isolates (30 for rifampin), while each of the other 2 AA testing sites had 35 AA results (4/39 isolates required CO2); site C had 34 AA results available for doxycycline.

b

One rifampin MIC was ≥16 μg/ml.

c

Only the trimethoprim portion of the 1/19 drug ratio is displayed for the MIC.