Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul 8;20(8):1019–1025. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02403.x

TABLE 2.

Hierarchical Linear Model Predicting Postmanipulation Stroop Performance (Reaction Time) in Study 2

Variable Coefficient t df p
Intercept, β0
Intercept, γ00 470.94 (12.09) 38.95 34 < .001
Condition, γ01 27.24 (12.31) 2.21 34 < .05
Baseline Stroop effect, γ02 4.22 (11.23) 0.38 34 .71
Condition × Stroop Effect, γ03 -18.60 (11.23) -1.66 34 .11
Color, β1
Intercept, γ10 -2.01 (2.58) -0.78 1781 .44
Condition, γ11 -5.64 (2.58) -2.19 1781 < .05
Baseline Stroop effect, γ12 -0.91 (2.17) -0.42 1781 .68
Condition × Stroop Effect, γ13 -0.47 (2.17) -0.22 1781 .83
Morality, β2
Intercept, γ20 -1.31 (3.33) -0.39 1781 .69
Condition, γ21 7.00 (3.28) 2.13 1781 < .05
Baseline Stroop effect, γ22 1.42 (2.45) 0.58 1781 .56
Condition × Stroop Effect, γ23 -1.43 (2.45) -0.58 1781 .56
Color × Morality, β3
Intercept, γ30 -2.82 (2.31) -1.22 1781 .22
Condition, γ31 0.09 (2.37) 0.04 1781 .97
Baseline Stroop effect, γ32 -3.62 (2.09) -1.73 1781 .08
Condition × Stroop Effect, γ33 -7.94 (2.09) -3.80 1781 < .001

Note. Standard errors are given in parentheses.