Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Mar 24;28(9):1473–1487. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2017942

TABLE IV.

Statistical comparison of average label alignment. improvement: +++ p < 0.01, ++ p < 0.05, + p < 0.1. Equivalent: =. Impairment: − − − p > 0.99. L and R denote left and right, respectively.

l-AMY r-AMY l-HIP r-HIP l-STG r-STG l-PHG r-PHG
iC2 vs. ALL +++ +++ +++ ++ + − − − ++ +++
iC2 vs. CLIN +++ +++ +++ + +++ − − − ++ +++
iC3 vs. ALL +++ +++ +++ ++ +++ = + =
iC3 vs. CLIN +++ +++ = + +++ = = +