Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Apr;21(4):803–820. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21059

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Lexical decision response times for real-word competitors of novel words trained on Day 1 (hence consolidated), Day 2 (unconsolidated), or untrained controls. Error bars show 1 SEM after between-subjects variability is removed, suitable for repeated measures comparisons (cf. Loftus & Masson, 1994). Statistical significance of planned pairwise comparisons (***p < .001, **p < .01, *p < .05, (*) p < .1, ns = nonsignificant). (B) Response times for novel words trained on Day 1 (consolidated), Day 2 (unconsolidated), or untrained controls in the auditory repetition test. Error bars and statistical significance as before. (C) Recognition memory performance for novel words trained on Day 1 or Day 2. (D) Rated strength of meaning for novel words trained on Day 1, Day 2, or untrained controls.