Table 8.
Troubleshooting table
Problem | Possible reason(s) | Solution(s) |
---|---|---|
Low DNA yields | → Incomplete lysis of tissue or cells | → Optimize cell or tissue disruption conditions (e.g., increase time or intensity of mechanical homogenization) |
→ DNA yield is sometimes tissue dependent, some tissues yield higher DNA amount than others | → Increase sample size | |
RNA contamination | → Inadequate RNA degradation during DNA isolation | → Increase RNase during extraction and prolong the incubation time |
Inconsistent retention times during HPLC pre-purification or LC/MS-MS | → Column not equilibrated prior to purification | → Increase column equilibration time |
→ Inconsistent column pressures due to inadequate degassing of mobile phases | → Use a degassing apparatus on the HPLC or Sonicate buffers for 20 min | |
→ Problems with the stationary phase in the column (e.g., use of high aqueous isocratic conditions during LC/MS/MS analysis leads to column collapse) | → Regenerate column by running 100% acetonitrile overnight at 0.100 ml/min; replace column, if necessary | |
dI levels are higher than expected | → Deaminase contamination | → Include or increase coformycin during all stages of DNA isolation and processing |
→ Contamination of dI with dA during HPLC pre-purification or LC/MS-MS; m/z values differ by 1, so dA isotopomer signals (M+1) contribute to dI signal | → Decrease the % organic solvent to resolve the dA and dI peaks | |
dX and dO levels are higher than expected | → Contamination of dX or dO with dG during HPLC pre-purification or LC/MS-MS; m/z values differ by 1, so dG isotopomer signals (M+1) contribute to dX/dO signal | → Decrease the % organic solvent to resolve the dG and dX or dO peaks |
8-Oxo-dG levels are higher than expected | → Artifactual formation during sample work-up or in vacuo drying | → Include desferrioxamine and butylated hydroxytoluene during cell processing, DNA extraction and hydrolysis steps; process samples on ice; minimize sample evaporation time |
→ As 8-oxo-dG can be formed from 2′-deoxyguanosine (dG) in the ion source of the mass spectrometer it is important that dG contamination separates well from 8-oxo-dG prior to entering the MS | → Decrease the % organic solvent to resolve dG from 8-oxo-dG | |
εdC levels are higher than expected | → Contamination of εdC with dA due to similar HPLC retention times and identical m/z values | → Optimize the separation of εdC and dA in the pre-purification step. Also, optimize the HPLC step of the LC/MS-MS analysis to such that εdC elutes 2-3 min before dA. |