Table 1.
Study | Gender | Measurement/joint/movement | Age range (years) | Study design | Changes with aginga |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dean et al. 2004 [73] | F | IK/hip/FLX, EXT | 21–82 | CS | ↓22–33% |
Johnson et al. 2004 [72] | F | IK, IM/hip/AD, AB | 21–91 | CS | ↓24–34% IK, ↓44–56% IM |
Kubo et al. 2007 [71] | M | IM/ankle/PF | 20–77 | CS | ↓40% |
Morse et al. 2005 [70] | M | IM/ankle/PF | 25.3 ± 3.5–73.8 ± 3.5 | CS | ↓47% |
Petrella et al. 2005 [69] | M, F | IT/knee/EXT | 20–75 | CS | ↓41–137% |
Lanza et al. 2003 [68] | M | IT, IM/knee, ankle/EXT, DF | 20–85 | CS | ↓26–32% |
K isokinetic, IM isometric, IT isotonic, FLX flexion, EXT extension, AD adduction, AB abduction, PF plantar flexion; DF dorsiflexion, CS cross-sectional
aExpressed as percent change with aging