Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;11:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-38

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Performance comparison of SeqTrim, SeqClean, Lucy and ESTPrep. A, Overview of rates of sequence acceptance and rejection by each tested algorithm. B, Degree of agreement from concordance in rejection (0:4, which means none of the four implementations accept the same sequence) to concordance in acceptance (4:0, which means that the four accept the same sequence). C, Degree of agreement of SeqTrim with respect to the other three programs.