Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 4;285(11):8395–8407. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.038638

TABLE 1.

Effects of GADD45β on AP-1, CRE, and C/EBP reporter activities

ATDC5 cells were transfected with 300 ng of AP-1-Luc (top), CRE-Luc (middle), or C/EBP reporter (bottom) and 25 ng of plasmid encoding the indicated family member or GADD45β, alone or together, in a total of 400 ng/well. The values of firefly luciferase activities are normalized to Renilla luciferase activities of pRL-TK and shown as -fold induction compared with control (empty vector). Means ± S.D. from three or more independent experiments are shown.

Control c-Jun JunB JunD
Control 1.00 5.87 ± 1.83 1.60 ± 0.16 1.17 ± 0.13
Fra2 4.18 ± 0.99 6.77 ± 2.00 2.92 ± 0.57 6.78 ± 1.58
Gadd45β 2.01 ± 0.38 10.71 ± 2.38 1.08 ± 0.22 1.90 ± 0.32
Fra2/Gadd45β 8.10 ± 1.54 6.50 ± 2.63 3.70 ± 1.24 10.23 ± 1.38a,b
Control ATF2 ATF3 ATF4
Control 1.00 1.58 ± 0.19 0.95 ± 0.13 1.53 ± 0.31
GADD45β 2.78 ± 0.25 (2.78) 4.58 ± 1.06c (2.91) 1.83 ± 0.54c (1.92) 3.04 ± 0.93c (1.98)
Control C/EBPα C/EBPβ C/EBPδ
Control 1.00 24.13 ± 5.79 7.05 ± 1.59 5.11 ± 1.05
GADD45β 1.47 ± 0.12 (1.47) 43.38 ± 11.26d (2.00) 15.13 ± 4.57d (2.40) 10.61 ± 3.27d (2.34)

a p < 0.01 versus Fra2/Gadd45b.

b p < 0.01 versus Fra2/JunD.

c p < 0.01 versus GADD45b.

d p < 0.01 for C/EBPα, C/EBPβ, and C/EBPδ, respectively, versus GADD45β.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure