Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 21;36(2):347–358. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn075

Table 2.

Summary of the Sex Differences and Pooled Mean Scores in Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales, in Total and Comparing Studies With Only Students and Other Studies

Magical Ideation Scale Perceptual Aberration Scale Physical Anhedonia Scale Social Anhedonia Scale
Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women
N Mean Mean ES (d) N Mean Mean ES (d) N Mean Mean ES (d) N Mean Mean ES (d)
All studies 29 8.29 8.54 −0.01 22 5.25 5.67 −0.08 23 14.72 11.73 0.59 14 9.96 7.77 0.44
Only students
    Yes 21 8.62 9.08 −0.05 15 5.72 6.11 −0.03 14 14.62 11.37 0.47 10 9.89 7.71 0.42
    No 8 7.42 7.11 −0.02 7 4.25 4.72 −0.19a 9 14.86 12.27 0.40 4 10.13 7.91 0.42

Note: ES (d) = effect size (Cohen d). Statistically significant (P < .05, z test) ESs are in bold.

a

When compared with “only students,” ES was statistically significantly smaller in studies that included only students in Perceptual Aberration Scale (z = 3.19, P = .001).