Table 3.
Relationship Between MSCEIT Performance and Functional Outcome
| Variable | MSCEIT Total | Emotion Perception | Emotion Facilitation | Emotion Understanding | Emotion Management |
| Social Adjustment Scale-IIa | |||||
| Total | −.17 (−.07) | −.15 (.04) | −.18 (−.12) | −.08 (.05) | −.16 (−.13) |
| Interpersonal anguish | −.14 (−.10) | −.17 (.04) | −.22† (−.29*) | −.01 (.07) | −.04 (−.11) |
| Sexual relations | −.06 (−.06) | .06 (.03) | .03 (.05) | −.03 (.003) | −.20 (−.16) |
| Family/household relations | −.02 (.04) | .11 (.23†) | −.02 (.01) | −.01 (.02) | −.07 (−.06) |
| Social leisure | −.03 (.02) | −.05 (−.001) | −.09 (−.09) | .03 (.10) | −.03 (.01) |
| Major role functioning | −.25* (−.08) | −.19 (−.01) | −.21† (−.08) | −.24† (−.08) | −.19 (−.10) |
| Self-care | .05 (.09) | .16 (.21) | .07 (.10) | .08 (.13) | −.09 (−.08) |
| Performance Potential Inventoryb | |||||
| Total | .17 (.12) | .09 (.06) | .09 (.03) | .12 (−.01) | .19 (.16) |
| Daily living activities | −.04 (.03) | −.15 (−.08) | −.06 (−.01) | .01 (.02) | −.004 (.01) |
| Social functioning | .28* (.19) | .31* (.24†) | .13 (.01) | .23† (.08) | .22† (.18) |
| Task/work performance | .10 (.05) | .003 (−.04) | .08 (.03) | .02 (−.10) | .18 (.16) |
| Global work potential | .27* (.10) | .18 (.02) | .25* (.10) | .20 (−.01) | .26* (.16) |
| Global Assessment Scaleb | .16 (−.02) | .09 (−.11) | .14 (.02) | .09 (−.12) | .20 (.12) |
Note: Correlations adjusting for demographics (age, gender, education, and illness duration), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale31 total, and neurocognitive composite scores are presented in parentheses. MSCEIT = Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test.
a
Higher scores indicate worse functioning.
b
Higher scores indicate better functioning.
†P < .10, *P < .05, **P < .01, 2-tailed.