Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jan 1;14(1):41–47. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1252

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate Cox model assessing effects of covariates on overall survival

(A) Univariate Cox model
Variable All stages (n = 280)
Stages I and II (n = 213)
Hazard ratio P Hazard ratio P
Age 1.044 <0.0001 1.057 <0.0001
Histology Squamous cell vs. adenocarcinoma 1.585 0.02 1.667 0.03
Tumor* T 2 + 3 + 4 vs. T1 2.024 0.002
T2 + 3 vs. T1 2.175 0.002
Lymph node* N1 + 2 vs. N0 2.122 0.0003 2.531 0.0002
N1 vs. N0
Tumor stage* II + III + IV vs. I 2.01 0.0005
II vs. I 2.47 0.0002
Fus1 score mean 0.999 0.70 0.999 0.61
Fus1 score level Low vs. negative 0.535 0.06 0.502 0.07
Intermediate vs. negative 0.744 0.35 0.831 0.60
High§ vs. negative 0.685 0.28 0.536 0.13
(B) Multivariate Cox model
Variable All stages
Stages I and II
Hazard ratio P Hazard ratio P

Age 1.047 <0.0001 1.059 <0.0001
Histology Squamous cell vs. adenocarcinoma 1.528 0.04 1.438 0.13
Tumor stage* II + III + IV vs. I 2.163 0.0002
II vs. I 2.519 0.0004
Fus1 score level Low vs. negative 0.357 0.002 0.312 0.003
Intermediate vs. negative 0.474 0.02 0.544 0.10
High§ vs. negative 0.518 0.06 0.415 0.03
*

Pathologic tumor, lymph node, and metastasis stage.

Low and intermediate, reduced Fus1 immunohistochemical expression.

Negative, absence of Fus1 immunohistochemical expression.

§

High, preserved or normal Fus1 immunohistochemical expression.