Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 12;86(3):440–446. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.01.025

Table 2.

Comparison of Three Procedures Controlling for Global Type I error in the Genome-wide Scan of Fasting Glucose Levels in the EA Population of the ARIC

Region Candidate Gene(s) Total SNPsa MAFb No. of SNPs Identified
Bonferroni BH WBH
2p23.3 GCKR 1 0.40 0 0 1
2q24.3 G6PC2, ABCB11 19 0.29 ∼0.48 17 18 19
4q31.23 NR3C2 1 0.072 0 0 1
6p12.3 RUNX2 1 0.28 0 0 1
7p13 GCK 4 0.17 ∼0.22 4 4 4
11q21 MTNR1B 8 0.28 ∼0.43 7 7 8
13q21.32 PCDH9 1 0.00018 1 1 1
20p11.21 FOXA2 1 0.042 0 0 1

Total 36 29 30 36

The Bonferroni correction procedure controls the family-wise error rate at 0.05, whereas both the BH and WBH procedures control the FDR at 0.05. Abbreviations are as follows: MAF, minor allele frequency; BH, Benjamini and Hochberg procedure; WBH, weighted Benjamini and Hochberg procedure.

a

The number of significant SNPs in each region obtained with the use of the three procedures. The numbers are identical to those of the WBH procedure in this study.

b

The range of MAF for all of the significant SNPs (column 2) in each region calculated in the EA population of the ARIC.