Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 12;396(5):1329–1345. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.12.048

Table 1.

Parameters determined from the best fit of the folding/unfolding kinetics of Im7 solvation variants

Variant Position KUI (MUI) kIN (mIN) kNI (mNI) ΔG°UI (kJ mol− 1) ΔG°UN (kJ mol− 1) ΦI ΦTS2 βI βTS2
IV7Ta N term kUN 279.4 ± 10.69 (mUN 3.27 ± 0.06) kNU 3.40 ± 0.14 (mNU 0.68 ± 0.01) − 1.84 ± 1.22a − 10.38 ± 0.13 0.73b 1.00 ± 0.04 0.83 ± 0.005
F15Y Helix I 13.9 ± 3.02 (4.25 ± 0.18) 220.2 ± 14.77 (0.64 ± 0.34) 5.95 ± 0.12 (0.48 ± 0.01) − 6.19 ± 0.51 − 14.69 ± 0.54 0.62 ± 0.03 0.65 ± 0.03 0.79 ± 0.05 0.91 ± 0.02
V16T Helix I 52.9 ± 7.30 (4.18 ± 0.06) 244.5 ± 9.57 (0.49 ± 0.11 1.79 ± 0.08 (0.55 ± 0.02) − 9.34 ± 0.32 − 20.90 ± 0.35 0.79 ± 0.07 0.81 ± 0.06 0.80 ± 0.02 0.90 ± 0.01
V27T Loop 1 137.7 ± 16.49 (4.17 ± 0.05) 250.2 ± 8.60 (0.37 ± 0.07) 0.69 ± 0.08 (0.51 ± 0.04) − 11.59 ± 0.28 − 25.46 ± 0.39 ND ND 0.83 ± 0.01 0.90 ± 0.01
V36T Helix II 77.6 ± 11.29 (3.99 ± 0.06) 276.6 ± 11.63 (0.32 ± 0.1) 1.05 ± 0.08 (0.68 ± 0.03) − 10.24 ± 0.34 − 23.35 ± 0.40 ND ND 0.80 ± 0.02 0.86 ± 0.01
F41Y Helix II 80.0 ± 46.95 (3.37 ± 0.46) 186.1 ± 15.74 (0.84 ± 0.17) 40.43 ± 9.83 (0.40 ± 0.07) − 10.31 ± 1.38 − 13.90 ± 1.51 0.21 ± 0.10 0.28 ± 0.01 0.73 ± 0.04 0.91 ± 0.03
V42T Helix II 300.2 ± 62.79 (4.27 ± 0.10) 125.0 ± 3.30 (0.47 ± 0.05) 3.19 ± 0.19 (0.41 ± 0.02) − 13.42 ± 0.49 − 22.06 ± 0.52 − 0.23 ± 0.30 0.31 ± 0.17 0.83 ± 0.01 0.92 ± 0.01
IV54Ta Helix III 53.43 ± 6.21 (4.06 ± 0.08) 229.5 ± 11.90 (0.03 ± 0.13) 0.66 ± 0.07 (0.62 ± 0.04) − 9.36 ± 0.27 − 23.13 ± 0.40 − 0.89 ± 0.60 − 0.95 ± 0.38 0.86 ± 0.02 0.87 ± 0.01
Y55F Helix III 133.4 ± 22.41 (3.89 ± 0.06) 286.7 ± 9.77 (0.58 ± 0.07) 1.28 ± 0.12 (0.55 ± 0.03) − 11.51 ± 0.40 − 24.25 ± 0.46 ND ND 0.78 ± 0.01 0.89 ± 0.01
V69T Helix IV 20.01 ± 2.08 (4.51 ± 0.23) 225.8 ± 21.52 (0.42 ± 0.29) 0.53 ± 0.05 (0.68 ± 0.03) − 7.05 ± 0.24 − 21.30 ± 0.40 1.45 ± 0.17 1.53 ± 0.16 0.80 ± 0.04 0.88 ± 0.01
IV72Ta Helix IV 110.9 ± 13.70 (4.00 ± 0.05) 273.7 ± 9.66 (0.48 ± 0.08) 0.79 ± 0.07 (0.47 ± 0.03) − 11.08 ± 0.29 − 24.84 ± 0.36 ND ND 0.85 ± 0.04 0.88 ± 0.01
F84Y C term 7.55 ± 2.04 (3.25 ± 0.18) 114.4 ± 5.64 (1.02 ± 0.35) 1.01 ± 0.02 (0.80 ± 0.01) − 4.76 ± 0.64 − 15.88 ± 0.65 0.90 ± 0.03 1.06 ± 0.03 0.64 ± 0.05 0.84 ± 0.03
Im7 222.2 ± 55.56 (4.19 ± 0.10) 253.9 ± 11.46 (0.75 ± 0.09) 1.26 ± 0.14 (0.45 ± 0.04) − 12.71 ± 0.59 − 25.19 ± 0.65 0.78 ± 0.01 0.92 ± 0.01

Φ-values were calculated from kIU, kIN and kNI. For IV7T, the data were fitted to equations describing a two-state model of folding. βT values, which describe the solvent exposure of I or TS relative to the native state, were calculated from kinetic m values according to the equation:

βT=mUxmUx+mxN

The units of k are s− 1; units of M/m are kJ mol− 1 M− 1.

a

Indicates proteins for which Φ-values have been calculated using a pseudo wild-type (the corresponding I→V variant).

b

The chevron plot for this variant was fitted to equations describing apparent two-state folding and the maximum possible ΔG°UI estimated by modelling the minimum ΔG°UI required for refolding branch rollover to be observed (∼ 1 kJ mol− 1). The difference between the ΔG°UN obtained for IV7T from equilibrium denaturation (ΔG°UN − 12.22 ± 1.21 kJ mol− 1, data not shown) and kinetic experiments (ΔG°UN − 10.38 ± 0.13 kJ mol− 1) provides another means of estimating ΔG°UI. With this approach, a ΔG°UI of − 1.84 ± 1.22 kJ mol− 1 was determined for the IV7T variant. ND Φ-values were not calculated for these variants as ΔΔG°UN was too small (< 2.5 kJ mol− 1).34,35