Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar;11(3):169–176. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0900332

Table 1.

Phenotypic values of yield and yield components in a DH population and its two parent cultivars, Yerong and Franklin, under control and waterlogged conditions in two experiments

Exp. 1
Exp. 2
KW (mg)
GS
SP
PH (cm)
GY (g)
KW (mg)
GS
SL (cm)
PH (cm)
C W C W C W C W C W C W C W C W C W
Patient
 Yerong 45.70 39.85 35.7 39.7 9.4 8.5 70.3 69.5 140.8 146.2 53.58 49.05 46.3 43.0 7.1 6.4 112 92
 Franklin 34.56 33.65 15.7 14.9 14.2 14.1 66.3 69.8 29.4 27.9 36.49 33.61 25.6 24.3 9.1 7.7 109 81
DH population
 Two-row line mean 40.91 40.78 22 19.7 13.3 9.6 73.0 69.7 84.3 67.6 49.21 47.97 24.5 23.2 8.1 7.5 100 82
 Six-row line mean 33.21 31.68 37.6 36.5 12.2 9.2 70.1 70.4 109.1 95.5 35.22 34.55 40.7 36.8 6.9 5.9 101 77
 All lines
  Mean 35.8 34.8 31.9 30.4 12.6 9.3 71.1 70.1 99.5 85.9 40.5 40.0 34.8 31.6 7.4 6.6 100.8 78.8
  Range 16.0–57.4 20.3–59.7 13.6–57.7 5.9–59.9 3.8–22.4 1.5–15.3 58.0–90.8 61.1–76.6 26.0–220.1 7.2–204.0 25.9–68.1 22.0–64.6 15.3–57.0 16.8–54.4 3.9–11.4 3.1–11.6 84–120 57–99
  Skewness 0.45 0.58 0.25 0.39 0.42 0.05 0.26 −0.52 0.42 0.52 0.66 0.39 0.26 0.45 0.48 0.61 0.04 −0.13

KW: kernel weight; GS: grains per spike; SP: spikes per plant; PH: plant height; SL: spike length; GY: grain yield; C: control; W: waterlogging