Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar;48(4):1104–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.011

Table 2.

Results of experimental tests of familiarity and identification of public figures from voice, face and name in patients and controls.

QR KL Controls n = 20–24 mean (SD) Control range min–max
Voice
 Voice familiarity (/48) (% correct) 25 (52%) 28 (58%) 40.6 (4.0) 29–46
 Voice naming (/24) 0 0 16.7 (4.4) 7–23
 Voice recognition (/24) 0 0 18.8 (3.9) 10–23
 Cross-modal matching to face/name (/24) 3 3 23.5 (0.9) 21–24



Face
 Face familiarity (/48) (% correct) 29 (60%) 31 (64%) 46.7 (1.6) 43–48
 Face naming (/24) 6 3 21.4 (2.7) 16–24
 Face recognition (/24) 17 4 23.6 (0.8) 21–24
 Cross-modal matching to name (/24) 19 11 24.0 (0.0) 24–24
 Difficulty-matched faces: naming (/24) 6 1 14 (6.8)a 2–24
 Difficulty-matched faces: recognition (/24) 13 1 19 (5.6)a 3–24



Name
 Name familiarity (/48) (% correct) 43 (90%) 33 (69%) 46.6 (1.6) 42–48
a

Pilot control sample (n = 26) scores for identification of 24 faces (see Appendix B) were used to assess performance on this test.