Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Feb 27;50(8):911–919. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02074.x

Table 4.

Model fitting results examining the expanded longitudinal model of years 1, 2, and 3 home literacy environment (HLE) with years 1, 2 and 3 Boston Naming Test (BNT)

Model −2LL df Null χ2change NullΔdf Null pchange
Full 5461.32 1999
Drop all HLE factors 5502.15 2005 40.83 6 *
Drop HLE year 2 and HLE year 3 5472.36 2002 11.04 3 *
Drop HLE year 2 5472.36 2001 11.04 2 **
Drop HLE year 3 5461.32 2000 .00 1 NS

Note. The model fit of the full expanded longitudinal model versus a fully saturated model was tested. This resulted in a nonsignificant decrease in model fit (χ2change = 65.28, Δdf = 60, ns), suggesting that the full expanded longitudinal model fit the data as well as the saturated model. Therefore, the null full expanded longitudinal model was used as the full model.

**

p < .05

*

p < .001.