Table 4.
Model | −2LL | df | Null χ2change | NullΔdf | Null pchange |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Full | 5461.32 | 1999 | |||
Drop all HLE factors | 5502.15 | 2005 | 40.83 | 6 | * |
Drop HLE year 2 and HLE year 3 | 5472.36 | 2002 | 11.04 | 3 | * |
Drop HLE year 2 | 5472.36 | 2001 | 11.04 | 2 | ** |
Drop HLE year 3 | 5461.32 | 2000 | .00 | 1 | NS |
Note. The model fit of the full expanded longitudinal model versus a fully saturated model was tested. This resulted in a nonsignificant decrease in model fit (χ2change = 65.28, Δdf = 60, ns), suggesting that the full expanded longitudinal model fit the data as well as the saturated model. Therefore, the null full expanded longitudinal model was used as the full model.
p < .05
p < .001.