Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009 Dec 30;3(1):79–87. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.889741

Erg protein blots from LV (A) and RV (C) tissues for the 3 rabbit study groups (C, RV, and BIV). Erg bands as well as the coomessie-stained bands used to normalize for the protein load are shown. Also the Erg bands for the 3 study groups are from the same blot with identical exposure. B: Erg-peptide block, where the blot was exposed to anti-Erg+petide (1:3 ratio). Panels D and E are the graphic representation of the Erg protein levels from LV (D) and RV (E) tissues for the 3 study groups. Note the statistically significant increase in Erg levels in the 2 paced groups combined (RV and BIV) compared to the control group.

Erg protein blots from LV (A) and RV (C) tissues for the 3 rabbit study groups (C, RV, and BIV). Erg bands as well as the coomessie-stained bands used to normalize for the protein load are shown. Also the Erg bands for the 3 study groups are from the same blot with identical exposure. B: Erg-peptide block, where the blot was exposed to anti-Erg+petide (1:3 ratio). Panels D and E are the graphic representation of the Erg protein levels from LV (D) and RV (E) tissues for the 3 study groups. Note the statistically significant increase in Erg levels in the 2 paced groups combined (RV and BIV) compared to the control group.