Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Death Stud. 2009 Sep;33(8):691–711. doi: 10.1080/07481180903070392

Table 1.

Sample characteristics (N=135).

Variable % (n)
or
Mean (SD)
Without
Complicated
Grief Disorder
(N=119)
% (n)
With
Complicated
Grief Disorder
(N=16)
% (n)
Statistical Comparison
Statistical
Test
df p
Gender FET a ---- a 0.19
  • Male 20.0% (27) 22.0% (26) 6.3% (1)
  • Female 80.0% (108) 78.0% (108) 93.8% (15)
Ethnicity χ2=0.9 b 2 0.63
  • White 95.5% (129) 95.8% (114) 93.8% (15)
  • Black 3.0% (4) 2.5% (3) 6.3% (1)
  • Hispanic 1.5% (2) 1.68% (2) 0.0% (0)
Relationship to the
Deceased Person
χ2=1.3 b 3 0.74
  • Spouse 80% (108) 79.0% (94) 87.5% (14)
  • Child 5.2% (7) 5.0% (6) 6.3% (1)
  • Parent 10.4% (14) 10.9% (13) 6.3% (1)
  • Sibling 4.4% (6) 5.0% (6) 0.0% (0)
Age (years) 61.8 (13.7) 62.04 (13.8) 62.3 (8.9%) t= −0.08 130 0.94
Education (years) 14.0 (3.0) 14.27 (2.9) 13.3 (2.2%) t= 1.3 132 0.20
Time Since Death (days) 19.8 (6.6) 19.9 (6.3) 19.8 (6.7) W=1051.5 c ---- 0.81
a

Because the expected cell number is <5, Fisher’s exact test (FET) was conducted.

b

Because the expected cell number is <5, Cochran Mantel-Haenszel test was conducted.

c

Because the time to death variable is highly skewed (skewness>2), non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test (W) was conducted. Wilcoxon statistic and associated p-value were reported.