. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 9.

Published in final edited form as: Inverse Probl. 2010 Mar 1;26(3):3500521–35005229. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/26/3/035002

Table 2.

NLSEs between the class-averaged images/the deblurred images and the original projection image in the example of GroEL/ES.

Number of images		100	300	500
Case 1	Class average	0.0677	0.0517	0.0484
Case 1	Deblurred image	0.0447	0.0310	0.0295
Case 2	Class average	0.0952	0.0833	0.0849
Case 2	Deblurred image	0.0708	0.0533	0.0533
Case 3	Class average	0.1394	0.1115	0.1131
Case 3	Deblurred image	0.1019	0.0770	0.0775
Case 4	Class average	0.1935	0.1629	0.1615
Case 4	Deblurred image	0.1611	0.1291	0.1289