. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 9.

Published in final edited form as: Inverse Probl. 2010 Mar 1;26(3):3500521–35005229. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/26/3/035002

Table 5.

Cross correlation coefficients between the class-averaged images/the deblurred images and the original projection image in the example of GroEL/ES.

Number of images		100	300	500
Case 1	Class average	0.9903	0.9938	0.9937
Case 1	Deblurred image	0.9948	0.9970	0.9970
Case 2	Class average	0.9812	0.9869	0.9871
Case 2	Deblurred image	0.9870	0.9916	0.9917
Case 3	Class average	0.9977	0.9987	0.9988
Case 3	Deblurred image	0.9990	0.9995	0.9996
Case 4	Class average	0.9955	0.9966	0.9965
Case 4	Deblurred image	0.9975	0.9986	0.9987