Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2007 Nov 11;69(5):1210–1226. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00442.x

Table 4.

Estimates of the Association Between Romantic and Sexual Relationships in Late Adolescence and Union Formation Rates by Union Type in Early Adulthood Controlling for Family Background, Adolescent, and Postadolescent Characteristics (n = 4,911).

Cohabitation, No Marriage
Cohabitation, Married Partner
Cohabitation, Married Someone Else
Marriage Without Cohabitation
B SE B eB B SE B eB B SE B eB B SE B eB
Romantic involvement (no romantic relationship)
 Romantic no sex 0.47** 0.15 1.60 0.72** 0.23 2.05 1.42* 0.65 4.12 0.33 0.19 1.39
 Romantic with sex 0.75** 0.15 2.12 1.34** 0.25 3.82 1.69** 0.60 5.40 0.61** 0.19 1.83
Nonromantic sexual 0.20* 0.08 1.22 0.00 0.13 1.00 0.30 0.39 1.34 −0.20 0.18 0.82

Note: eB = exponentiated B. Controls are age, gender, race-ethnicity, parents’ education, and family structure, same-gender attraction, body mass index, opposite-gender friends in adolescence, pubertal development, closeness to parents attractiveness, popularity, self-esteem, religious attendance, Evangelical Christian affiliation, Add Health Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test score, course-taking and performance in high school, postsecondary enrollment, and time-varying pregnancy and fertility measures.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.