Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar;77(3):459–468. doi: 10.1124/mol.109.058768

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

MMPIP analogs exhibit lower efficacies in thallium flux assays, and the potency of MMPIP is lower than in calcium mobilization studies. A, compounds were preapplied to mGluR7a/HEK/GIRK cells before the addition of an EC80 concentration of l-AP4, and thallium flux through the GIRK channel was measured. B, MMPIP concentration-response in thallium flux assays using cells expressing mGluR4, mGluR7, mGluR8, and M4 muscarinic receptor. In each case, concentration-response curves were applied to cells before an appropriate EC80 concentration of either l-AP4 (mGluR4, 7, and 8) or acetylcholine (M4). The potency of MMPIP in these experiments was 2.0 ± 0.2 μM. C, corrected concentration-response curve for MMPIP after normalizing for nonspecific effects of the compound on M4/GIRK cells. Methods for this correction are described under Materials and Methods. Revised potency of MMPIP, 717 ± 89 nM. Values represent mean ± S.E.M. and are an n of three experiments performed in quadruplicate.