Table 3.
Literature comparison of survival data and revision rates for total ankle arthroplasty. Revision indication is expressed as a percentage of total revisions required per series
| Reference | Prosthesis | N | 5-year survival % | Revision rate | Aseptic loosening | Wound healing/infection | Edge loading/insert failure | Stress fracture | Pain/stiffness | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | n/N | % | n/N | % | n/N | % | n/N | % | n/N | % | n/N | ||||
| Hosman et al. [13] 2007 | Mix of prostheses | 202 | 86 | 7 | 14/202 | 71 | 10/14 | 14 | 2/14 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 7 | 1/14 |
| Henricson et al. [11] 2007 | Mix of prostheses | 531 | 78 | 19 | 101/531 | 30 | 31/101 | 13 | 13/101 | 8 | 8/101 | 2 | 2/101 | 11 | 11/101 |
| Fevang et al. [8] 2007 | Mix of prostheses | 257 | 89 | 11 | 27/257 | 48 | 13/27 | 7 | 2/27 | 7 | 2/27 | 4 | 1/27 | 18 | 5/27 |
| Anderson et al. [1] 2003 | STAR Single-coated | 51 | 70 | 23 | 12/51 | 58 | 7/12 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 2/12 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1/12 |
| Wood et al. [21] 2008 | STAR Single and dual-coated | 200 | 93 | 12 | 24/200 | 58 | 14/24 | 4 | 1/24 | 25 | 6/24 | 8 | 2/24 | 0 | 0 |
| Karantana et al. [current study] | STAR Dual-coated | 52 | 90 | 17 | 8/52 | 12 | 1/8 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 2/8 | 25 | 2/8 | 25 | 2/8 |
n/a = revision indication not reported.