Table 5.
Unadjusted | Adjusted 1 | Adjusted 2 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RR/PR | (95% CI) | P-value | RR/PR | (95% CI) | P-value | RR/PR | (95%CI) | P-value | |
Males | |||||||||
Participant's education | |||||||||
High | 1.00 | ---- | |||||||
Intermediate | 0.79 | (0.69, 0.89) | <0.01 | 0.80 | (0.70, 0.90) | <0.01 | ---- | ---- | ---- |
Low | 0.76 | (0.65, 0.88) | <0.01 | 0.76 | (0.66, 0.89) | <0.01 | ---- | ---- | ---- |
Parents' education | |||||||||
High | 1.00 | Reference | 1.00 | Reference | 1.00 | Reference | |||
Intermediate | 0.94 | (0.83, 1.07) | 0.35 | 0.95 | (0.84, 1.08) | 0.44 | 1.01 | (0.88, 1.14) | 0.93 |
Low | 0.82 | (0.71, 0.94) | <0.01 | 0.84 | (0.73, 0.96) | 0.01 | 0.91 | (0.78, 1.04) | 0.17 |
Females | |||||||||
Participant's education | |||||||||
High | 1.00 | 1.00 | ---- | ||||||
Intermediate | 0.85 | (0.77, 0.93) | <0.01 | 0.85 | (0.77, 0.93) | <0.01 | ---- | ---- | ---- |
Low | 0.81 | (0.74, 0.90) | <0.01 | 0.84 | (0.76, 0.92) | <0.01 | ---- | ---- | ---- |
Parents' education | |||||||||
High | 1.00 | Reference | 1.00 | Reference | 1.00 | Reference | |||
Intermediate | 0.90 | (0.82, 0.99) | 0.02 | 0.93 | (0.85, 1.02) | 0.12 | 0.97 | (0.89, 1.07) | 0.53 |
Low | 0.94 | (0.86, 1.02) | 0.14 | 0.97 | (0.88, 1.05) | 0.44 | 1.00 | (0.92, 1.09) | 0.99 |
* high = scores 5 to 10
RR: relative risk, PR: prevalence ratio, CI: confidence interval
Participant's education adjusted 1 includes: age for males and age, marital status and area of residence for females.
Parents' education adjusted 1 includes age for males and age, marital status and area of residence for females. Adjusted 2 models include additional adjustment for participant's education level.
RR/PR were estimated using log binomial regression models
Males, n = 918; females, n = 1033