Table 2.
Variable Level |
β1 | SE2 | z-value | P of z-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | -0.36 | 0.59 | -0.62 | 0.54 |
Housing conditions | ||||
Tied system | Ref.3 | |||
Loose system | 0.71 | 0.316 | 2.23 | 0.03 |
Animal dehorning | ||||
No | Ref. | |||
Yes | 1.11 | 0.302 | 3.66 | 0.0002 |
Presence of horseflies in summer | ||||
Never or seldom | Ref. | |||
Sometimes or often | -0.24 | 0.341 | -0.70 | 0.49 |
Very high | 0.82 | 0.321 | 2.56 | 0.01 |
Colostrum feeding | ||||
No | Ref. | |||
From dam to calves | -1.11 | 0.52 | -2.13 | 0.03 |
Pooled | -0.90 | 0.55 | -1.65 | 0.10 |
1estimated coefficients, 2standard error for the coefficient, 3reference category
Standard deviation in mixing distribution = 1.054, Standard error = 0.099
Starting from the full model with seven variables selected by univariate analyses, the best model was constructed on the basis of AIC. The best model with the smallest AIC included housing system, dehorning, observable presence of horseflies, and direct colostrum feeding. The coefficients (β values) indicate that loose housing, dehorning, and observation of a large number of horseflies in summer were positively associated with seroprevalence on infected farms (β values > 0, p values < 0.05). In contrast, feeding of colostrum was negatively associated with seroprevalence in the infected farms (β = -1.11, p = 0.03)