Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 10;5(3):e9532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009532

Figure 3. Analysis of mitochondrial function.

Figure 3

Mitochondrial membrane potential (A), ATP levels (B), and mitochondrial ROS (C) of cortical astrocytes. Cells treated with the mitochondrial inhibitors 25 µM rotenone, 10 µM antimycin A (Ant A)or 25 µM FCCP. (A) Cells cultured in 48-well plates were first exposed to the inhibitors or vehicle control (0.5% DMSO) for 1 hr prior to addition of 1µM JC-1. After an additional hour of incubation in a CO2 incubator, both red (Ex = 530, Em = 590 nm) and green (Ex = 485, Em = 530 nm) fluorescence was measured. After background subtraction, the ratio of red to green fluorescence was calculated as a measure of mitochondrial membrane potential. Values represent means of 16 determinations ± SEM. * p<0.05 compared with STAT3 +/+ using 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test. ∧ p<0.05 compared with control. (B) ATP levels were measured using the Promega CellTitre-Glo luminescence assay and a standard curve for ATP quantification. Values represent means of 6 determinations ± SEM. The experiment was repeated twice with similar results. (C) Mitochondrial-specific ROS assays were performed in 96-well culture plates as described in Materials and Methods. Values represent means of 60 determinations ± SEM. * p<0.05 compared with STAT3 +/+ using 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test. ∧ p<0.05 compared with vehicle-treated control cells.