TABLE 4.
Examples of Participant Motives for Participating in the First Year of the Baltimore Experience Corps Trial: Baltimore, MD, 2006–2007 School Year
Motives37 and Examples | Screened and Eligible Participants, No. or No (%) | Participants Not Recruited, No. or No (%) | Participants Recruited, No. or No (%) | Pa |
Participants responding to motivation questions | 310 | 176 | 134 | |
Altruism | 188 (61) | 104 (59) | 84 (63) | .52 |
Giving back to the community | 118 | 64 | 54 | |
Helping others is important | 125 | 71 | 54 | |
The idea of doing something “good” | 40 | 19 | 21 | |
Volunteering is a social responsibility | 58 | 29 | 29 | |
Wanted to help in a research study | 7 | 4 | 3 | |
To make a difference and help schoolchildren | 3 | 1 | 2 | |
Ideology | 204 (66) | 109 (62) | 95 (71) | .10 |
Worthwhile cause | 170 | 91 | 79 | |
Civil rights (helping the underserved) | 123 | 65 | 58 | |
Religious reasons, calling from God | 28 | 18 | 10 | |
To be a better person | 72 | 37 | 35 | |
Material reward | 87 (28) | 46 (26) | 41 (31) | .39 |
It is good for me | 68 | 37 | 31 | |
Money for participation would be helpful | 22 | 11 | 11 | |
Relative (child) attends a school with EC | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Good for my health (physical, mental, etc.) | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Status reward | 27 (9) | 13 (7) | 14 (10) | .34 |
Learn new skills | 23 | 12 | 11 | |
Gain recognition in the community | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Gain experience or connections to get a job | 4 | 2 | 2 | |
Social relationships | 56 (18) | 29 (16) | 27 (20) | .41 |
Make friends | 42 | 20 | 22 | |
Be with friends in existing school with EC | 8 | 6 | 2 | |
Make friends with people of different age | 30 | 12 | 18 | |
Leisure time | 120 (39) | 71 (40) | 49 (37) | .50 |
Bored | 85 | 48 | 37 | |
Make better use of spare time | 112 | 67 | 45 | |
Personal growth | 75 (24) | 38 (22) | 37 (28) | .22 |
Grow personally | 54 | 27 | 27 | |
Have a sense of purpose in life | 40 | 20 | 20 | |
Feel valued and needed | 21 | 9 | 12 | |
Want to learn | 23 | 12 | 11 |
Note. EC = Experience Corps Baltimore City. The total number of participants who were screened and were eligible was N = 368.
Between participants recruited and not recruited.