Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 1;107(5):2102–2107. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908281107

Table 3.

M-ratio analysis in the T. thynnus samples

Sample θ M Mcrit P value
HADR 29.7 0.82 0.69 0.465
0.5 0.82 0.79 0.056
10 0.82 0.70 0.278
HSTY 39.9 0.73 0.60 0.490
0.5 0.73 0.79 0.004
10 0.73 0.66 0.095
CADR 35.0 0.84 0.69 0.634
0.29* 0.84 0.82 0.065
0.5 0.84 0.79 0.090
10 0.84 0.70 0.392
CSTY 28.0 0.76 0.65 0.287
0.15* 0.76 0.83 0.005
0.5 0.76 0.79 0.011
10 0.76 0.68 0.112
CLIG 31.3 0.79 0.64 0.660
0.5 0.79 0.79 0.030
10 0.79 0.67 0.300
CSAR 20.8 0.75 0.63 0.320
0.5 0.75 0.75 0.008
10 0.75 0.75 0.148
CALG 29.3 0.79 0.79 0.523
0.5 0.79 0.79 0.024
10 0.79 0.79 0.239
CALB 21.9 0.80 0.80 0.521
0.5 0.80 0.80 0.030
10 0.80 0.80 0.317

For each sample, we performed M estimates using three tentative θ values based on the long-term θ estimated by LAMARC (first row), θ = 0.5 (second row), and θ = 10 (third row), except for CADR and CSTY samples. In these samples, an estimate of M was also calculated using a short-term θ value (*) computed by the temporal method. Significant P values are presented in boldface.