Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 2.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2010 Jan 18;121(4):505–511. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.886655

Table 3.

Measures of model fit, discrimination and calibration for various cardiovascular event models with and without carotid-femoral (aortic) pulse wave velocity.

Model Fit
Discrimination
Calibration
Model
−2 Log Likelihood
Akaike Information Criterion
Schwartz’s Bayesian Information Criterion
C Statistic (95% CI)
χ2
P
Age, sex 2155 2159 2165 0.762 (0.723, 0.801) 8.7 0.46
Add pulse wave velocity 2136 2142 2151 0.782 (0.746, 0.818)* 2.9 0.97
Age, sex, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, systolic pressure, smoking, diabetes and hypertension treatment 2126 2142 2166 0.796 (0.764, 0.828) 4.3 0.89
Add pulse wave velocity 2116 2134 2162 0.800 (0.768, 0.832)** 2.6 0.98

For a description of the tests displayed in the table, please see statistical methods section.

*

Comparison of c statistics in rows 1 and 2, P=0.006.

**

Comparison of c statistics in rows 3 and 4, P=0.3.