Abstract
Pathological myopia is a severe hereditary ocular disease leading to blindness. It is urgent and very important to find the pathogenesis and therapy for this disease. The purpose of the study is to analyze sequences of lumican and decorin genes with pathological myopia(PM) and control subjects to verify the relationship between lumican, decorin genes and PM in Northern Han Chinese. We collected and analyzed the blood samples of 94 adults (including 12 pedigree cases and 82 sporadic cases) with PM and 90 controls in the northern Han ethnic Chinese. Genotyping was performed by direct sequencing after polymerase chain reaction(PCR) amplification and allele frequencies were tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences between two groups for three SNPs: rs3759223 (C → T) and rs17853500 (T → C) of the lumican gene and rs74419 (T → C) of decorin gene with (P < .05) for all their genotype distribution and allele frequency. There is no significant difference for incidence of these mutations between pedigree and sporadic group (P > .05). The results suggested that the sequence variants in 5′-regulatory region of lumican gene and 3'UTR of decorin gene were associated significantly with PM in Northern Han Chinese. Further studies are needed to confirm finally whether the two genes are the virulence genes of PM.
1. Introduction
Myopia is a highly prevalent eye disease and significant public health problem involving genetic and environmental factors. Pathological myopia, generally named also high myopia, is defined as a refractive error of at least −6.00 diopters (D) with pathological changes, such as temperal crescent, pigment epithelium thinning, leopard retina, Fuch's Macula, retina-choroidal atrophy, and so on. It is a kind of severe hereditary ocular disease that can result in blindness. Pathological myopia affects approximately 2.8–4.6% of the adult population in Australia, the United States, and Western Europe [1], and 0.95% in China [2]. The heritage and genetic heterogeneity of PM have been confirmed. Up to now, 10 affirmative gene loci had been known in nonsyndromic PM, including Xq28(MYP1), 18p11.31(MYP2), 12q21-q23(MYP3), 7q36(MYP4), 17q21-q22 (MYP5), 4q22-q27, 2q37.1, Xq23-q25, 15q12-13, and 5p15.33-p15.2 [3–12], although no gene has been confirmed finally among them. The development of PM involves anterior-posterior enlargement of the eye, scleral thinning, and frequent detachment of the retina resulting from stress associated with excessive axial elongation. As a connective tissue, the sclera provides the structural framework that defines the shape and axial length of the eye.
In MYP3, lumican and decorin genes are two important candidate genes, and express protein parts of proteoglycans-lumican and decorin in extracellular matrix (ECM). Proteoglycans can affect the growth of fibers and is closely related to sclerotic growth and function, whose alteration of expression is likely to affect scleral shape and in turn could lead to elongation of the eye axis and even the development of PM.
In this study, the purpose is to analyze sequences of all the exons and 5′-regulatory region around the rs3759223 in the lumican gene and the exons 7 and 8 of decorin gene in individuals with PM and control subjects in the Northern Han ethnic Chinese, and try to verify further the relationship between lumican, decorin genes and PM according to the recent disputable published paper [13, 14].
2. Methods
The subjects: 94 adult patients, including 12 pedigree cases (Figure 1) and 82 sporadic cases with PM (<−6.00D) and 90 controls, were recruited to study the relationships between the lumican, decorin genes and PM. All the patients showed a changing of ocular fundus such as temperal crescent, pigment epithelium thinning, leopard retina, Fuch's macula, retina-choroidal atrophy, and so on, which were not found in all of the controls. No participant had known ocular disease and injury that could predispose to PM, such as a history of retinopathy, prematurity, neonatal problems, a known genetic disease or connective tissue disorder associated with PM, such as Stickler and Marfan syndrome [15]. All cases and controls involved in this study had similar social backgrounds and were from the Northern Han ethnic Chinese, with no ethnic subdivision. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Dalian Medical University, and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Blood samples were collected for genomic DNA isolation after obtaining informed consent from the subjects. Further information of all subjects is listed as Table 1.
Table 1.
Controls | Patients | |
---|---|---|
Number | 90 | 94 |
Sex (male/female) | 45/45 | 44/50 |
Age (mean ± s, years) | 36 ± 13.1 | 37 ± 12.7 |
Refractive degree (mean ± s, D) | 0 ± 0.25 | −9.5 ± 3.0 |
Ocular axial length (mean ± s, mm) | 24.23 ± 0.27 | 28.18 ± 1.02 |
2.1. Genotyping
The genomic DNA was extracted from 5 to 10 mL of venous blood from all participants. DNA was purified from lymphocyte pellets according to standard procedures using a puregene DNA isolation kit (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The sequences corresponding to all the exons and 5′-regulatory region around the rs3759223 in the lumican gene and the exons 7 and 8 of decorin gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The primer sequences used in the PCR analysis are shown in Table 2. The PCR was performed in a 25 μL reaction volume containing 2.5 μL 10 × GC buffer (Tiangen, Beijing, and China), 200 μmol/L of dNTP, 0.2 μmol/L of each primer, 1.0 unit of Tag DNA polymerase (Tiangen, Beijing, and China), and 60 ng of genomic DNA. The conditions, after initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 minutes, were 35 cycles of 30s at 94°C, 1 minute at 50 to 62°C, and 1 minute at 72°C, followed by final extension at 72°C for 7 minutes. The products of PCR remained at 4°C and were purified by using a Multi Screen-PCR plate (Millipore). The purified PCR products were bidirectionally sequenced by using the ABI 3700 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
Table 2.
Gene | Fragment name | Primer sequence (5′–3′) | Length (bp) |
---|---|---|---|
lumican | Rs3759223 | F:AAATATGCTCTGAAACGCACAA | 250 |
R:AACAATGCTATGTATTAATTTTGAGTG | |||
Exon 2 | F:TGTTGCAAATTGAATGTCTTTTTC | 992 | |
R:GAGCACACATCAAACACAGGA | |||
Exon 3a | F: ACAACAATGGGATCCATTTATATTTC | 585 | |
R:TATGGATACTATGAAAACTGACACACA | |||
Exon 3b | F: CCGGATATGTATGAATGTCTACG | 495 | |
R: TTGCAATATTCTTGGCCTCA | |||
decorin | Exon 7 | F:GAAAGGCATCCATGTGTGGT | 239 |
R:CTTCCCAGCATCCCATAAGC | |||
Exon 8a | F: ACCTGAAGGGCCTCAACATA | 622 | |
R: TGCTCAATGAATTACAGAAGACTCA | |||
Exon 8b | F: GGAGTAAATATATATGTC | 584 | |
R: CTTACGTCTAATACATCTAG |
2.2. Statistical Analysis
The Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) was tested with the Chi-square (χ 2) goodness-of-fit test. The frequencies of genotype and allele were also compared between the patients and control subjects by using the Fisher Chi-square analysis. Bonferroni's correction was applied to adjust the significance level in multiple comparisons, and a P value of less than 0.017 (equal to 0.05/3) was considered as statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
Genotype distribution was in agreement with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium both in control subjects and patients (P > .05, data shown in Table 3).
Table 3.
Gene | SNP (mutation, location) | Group | Genotype (%) | P value | HWE | Allele (%) | P value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
lumican | Rs3759223 (C → T, 5′RR) | C/C | C/T | T/T | .000 | C | T | .000 | ||
Case | 0.064 | 0.330 | 0.606 | 0.527 | 0.229 | 0.771 | ||||
Control | 0.5 | 0.356 | 0.144 | 0.078 | 0.678 | 0.322 | ||||
Rs17853500 (T → C, Exon 2) | T/T | T/C | C/C | .000 | T | C | .000 | |||
Case | 0.479 | 0.362 | 0.160 | 0.059 | 0.660 | 0.340 | ||||
Control | 0.833 | 0.167 | 0.000 | 0.388 | 0.917 | 0.083 | ||||
Rs11105988 (A → T, intron2) | A/A | A/T | T/T | .997 | A | T | .992 | |||
Case | 0.798 | 0.170 | 0.032 | 0.087 | 0.833 | 0.117 | ||||
Control | 0.800 | 0.167 | 0.033 | 0.070 | 0.833 | 0.117 | ||||
Rs17018718 (G → A, intron2) | G/G | G/A | A/A | .996 | A | G | .966 | |||
Case | 0.830 | 0.149 | 0.021 | 0.175 | 0.096 | 0.904 | ||||
Control | 0.833 | 0.144 | 0.022 | 0.140 | 0.094 | 0.906 | ||||
| ||||||||||
Decorin | Rs7441 (T → C, 3′UTR) | T/T | C/T | C/C | .033 | C | T | .004 | ||
Case | 0.053 | 0.223 | 0.723 | 0.067 | 0.835 | 0.165 | ||||
Control | 0.122 | 0.333 | 0.544 | 0.073 | 0.711 | 0.289 |
3.2. Case-Control Analysis
Mutation analysis by direct sequencing showed 5 mutations (4 for lumican gene and 1 for decorin gene) which corresponded with SNPs previously reported in public databases (Table 3). For the lumican gene, rs3759223 (C → T, P < .017) was located in the 5′regulatory region (5′RR) of the gene (−4006 bp), while rs17853500 (T → C, N169N, P < .017) was located exon 2. Rs11105988 (A → T, P > .017) and rs17018718 (G → A, P > .017) were in the intron2 of lumican gene, and rs7441 (T → C, P > .017) was in the 3′untranslated region (3′UTR) of decorin gene. Significant difference was shown for rs3759223 and rs17853500 between patients and control subjects (direct sequencing figures shown as Figures 2, 3, and 4). There is no significant difference for incidence of these mutations between pedigree and sporadic groups (P > .017).
4. Discussion
Nonsyndromic PM is a complex and common disorder that is likely attributed to alterations of multiple genetic factors. Indeed, 10 loci had been mapped for the disorder. Among these, MYP3 showed significant linkage of autosomal dominant PM to a locus at chromosome 12q21–23 in a large German/Italian family [5]. Lumican and decorin are two important candidate genes of PM in MYP3. They are members of the small leucine rich proteoglycan (SLRP) gene family [16]. The proteoglycans are major components of the scleral ECM. These small proteoglycans play an important role in regulating collagen fibril assembly and interaction and are intensely related to the structure and function of sclera [17, 18]. Additionally, the human sclera had been shown to contain lumican and decorin [19, 20].
In recent years, intense relationship between lumican, decorin genes and PM had been confirmed from animal experiments and DNA analyzing of patients' blood. The defects observed in sclera collagen fibril diameter and organization in lumican-deficient mice were expected to lead to severe defects in ocular shape and size [21]. In the lumican-null mice, the collagen fibrils were thinner, and the spatial distribution of the fibrils was less well organized than the wildtype [21]. In the study of mice with a disrupted decorin gene, the fragile skin and abnormal tendon phenotypes initially observed were found to be due to fundamental alterations in collagen fibers. Accordingly, decorin was considered as a vital player in maintaining skin and tendon integrity at the molecular level [22]. Another mouse study also implicated the proteoglycans-lumican and fibromodulin as functional candidate genes for high myopia [23]. Research by analyzing DNA of patients' blood in Taiwan indicated that an SNP of the lumican gene might confer susceptibility to high myopia [13]. The SNP (rs3759223) of the lumican gene is located 4.406 bp upstream from exon 1, and considered a putative regulatory element of the lumican gene.
The mutations at 5 sites were found in our study: rs3759223 (C → T), rs17853500 (T → C), rs11105988 (A → T), and rs17018718 (G → A) for lumican gene and rs7441 (T → C) for decorin gene. Rs3759223 is located -4006 bp in the 5′regulatory region (5′RR) of lumican gene (4.406 bp upstream from exon 1), and is considered a putative regulatory element of the lumican gene that influenced the promoter activities. This research showed that variation ratio of rs3759223 was significantly higher in PM group than control group in the Northern Han ethnic group in China, which is infact compatible with the results obtained from lumican-deficient mice [18, 21], and analyzing DNA of patients in Taiwan [13]. Although the association between rs3759223 and high myopia was not recently supported in Chinese living in southeast China [14], it is worth notice that the genetic heterogeneity and the regional difference probably led to variation in genetics. We thus surmise that rs3759223 could regulate the promoter activity of the lumican gene, and then affect the formation of collagen fibrils in the scleral coat during the development of PM in the Northern Han ethnic Chinese. Rs17853500 located in exon 2 of lumican gene was a synonymous mutation (N169N), which did not change sequences of amino acids and formation of protein. Rs11105988, rs17018718, and rs7441 did not show significant difference between PM cases and controls, which might be unrelated to development of PM, although rs7441 was found in the 3′UTR of exon 8 of decorin gene, which could regulate stability of transcript, subcellular localization, and translational level [24].
This study provided additional new insight into the genetics of PM, and suggested that rs3759223 in lumican gene expressed in the eye, might be among the genetic risk factors causing the pathogenesis of PM in Northern Han Ethic Chinese. Further research should be performed to confirm whether lumican is the virulence gene of PM, and how the mutation of lumican gene acts in the development of PM.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all the subjects for their enthusiastic participation in the project. This work is supported by Grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 30872834).
References
- 1.Kempen JH, Mitchell P, Lee KE, et al. The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2004;122(4):495–505. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hu D-N. Prevalence and mode of inheritance of major genetic eye diseases in China. Journal of Medical Genetics. 1987;24(10):584–588. doi: 10.1136/jmg.24.10.584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schwartz M, Haim M, Skarsholm D. X-linked myopia: Bornholm eye disease. Linkage to DNA markers on the distal part of Xq. Clinical Genetics. 1990;38(4):281–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Young TL, Ronan SM, Drahozal LA, et al. Evidence that a locus for familial high myopia maps to chromosome 18p. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1998;63(1):109–119. doi: 10.1086/301907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Young TL, Ronan SM, Alvear AB, et al. A second locus for familial high myopia maps to chromosome 12q. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1998;63(5):1419–1424. doi: 10.1086/302111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Naiglin L, Gazagne C, Dallongeville F, et al. A genome wide scan for familial high myopia suggests a novel locus on chromosome 7q36. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2002;39(2):118–124. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.2.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Paluru P, Ronan SM, Heon E, et al. New locus for autosomal dominant high myopia maps to the long arm of chromosome 17. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2003;44(5):1830–1836. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang Q, Guo X, Xiao X, Jia X, Li S, Hejtmancik JF. A new locus for autosomal dominant high myopia maps to 4q22–q27 between D4S1578 and D4S1612. Molecular Vision. 2005;11:554–560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Paluru PC, Nallasamy S, Devoto M, Rappaport EF, Young TL. Identification of a novel locus on 2q for autosomal dominant high-grade myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2005;46(7):2300–2307. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang Q, Guo X, Xiao X, Jia X, Li S, Hejtmancik JF. Novel locus for X linked recessive high myopia maps to Xq23–q25 but outside MYP1. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2006;43(5, article e20):1–5. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.037853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yu Z-Q, Li Y-B, Huang C-X, et al. A genome-wide screening for pathological myopia suggests a novel locus on chromosome 15q12-13. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology. 2007;43(3):233–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lam CY, Tam PO, Fan DS, et al. A genome-wide scan maps a novel high myopia locus to 5p15. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2008;49(9):3768–3778. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang I-J, Chiang T-H, Shih Y-F, et al. The association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the 5′-regulatory region of the lumican gene with susceptibility to high myopia in Taiwan. Molecular Vision. 2006;12:852–857. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang P, Li S, Xiao X, et al. High myopia is not associated with the SNPs in the TGIF, lumican, TGFB1, and HGF genes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2009;50(4):1546–1551. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nollen GJ, Mulder BJM. What is new in the Marfan syndrome? International Journal of Cardiology. 2004;97(supplement 1):103–108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Iozzo RV. The biology of the small leucine-rich proteoglycans: functional network of interactive proteins. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274(27):18843–18846. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.27.18843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kuc IM, Scott PG. Increased diameters of collagen fibrils precipitated in vitro in the presence of decorin from various connective tissues. Connective Tissue Research. 1997;36(4):287–296. doi: 10.3109/03008209709160228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Austin BA, Coulon C, Liu CY, Kao WW-Y, Rada JA. Altered collagen fibril formation in the sclera of lumican-deficient mice. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2002;43(6):1695–1701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Young TL, Scavello GS, Paluru PC, Choi JD, Rappaport EF, Rada JA. Microarray analysis of gene expression in human donor sclera. Molecular Vision. 2004;10:163–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Young TL, Guo XD, King RA, Johnson JM, Rada JA. Identification of genes expressed in a human scleral cDNA library. Molecular Vision. 2003;9:508–514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Beecher N, Chakravarti S, Joyce S, Meek KM, Quantock AJ. Neonatal development of the corneal stroma in wild-type and lumican-null mice. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2006;47(1):146–150. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reed CC, Iozzo RV. The role of decorin in collagen fibrillogenesis and skin homeostasis. Glycoconjugate Journal. 2002;19(4-5):249–255. doi: 10.1023/A:1025383913444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chakravarti S, Paul J, Roberts L, Chervoneva I, Oldberg A, Birk DE. Ocular and scleral alterations in gene-targeted lumican-fibromodulin double-null mice. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2003;44(6):2422–2432. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grzybowska EA, Wilczynska A, Siedlecki JA. Regulatory functions of 3′UTRs. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2001;288(2):291–295. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]