Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Feb;33(2):117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.12.008

Table 2.

Summary of comparison of within group and between group changes in Aδ fiber mediated pain sensitivity.

Pre Post Mean Difference 95% CI Effect Size (Cohen's d)
WITHIN GROUP COMPARISONS
Low Back
AP 35.7(20.4) 30.1(17.0) 5.6(11.0) 0.1 – 11.1* 0.30
No AP 36.5(20.4) 29.9(22.3) 6.6(12.3) 1.1 – 12.1* 0.31
Lower Extremity
AP 31.1(19.4) 28.3(17.0) 2.8(11.7) -1.4 – 7.1 0.15
No AP 31.7(22.1) 32.2(26.1) -0.5(12.0) -5.8 – 4.8 -0.02
BETWEEN GROUP COMPARISONS (Change Scores)
Low Back
AP × No AP -1.0(11.3) -6.5 – 8.6 -0.09
Lower Extremity
AP × No AP 3.3(10.3) -10.1 – 3.5 0.32

Key: AP= audible pop, No AP= no audible pop; Pain sensitivity assessed with 101 point numeric rating scale anchored with 0= no pain and 100= worst pain sensation imaginable. All findings are presented in mean (standard deviation).

*

= significant at p< 0.05.