Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 18;37(3):1117–1128. doi: 10.1118/1.3301594

Table 1.

Differences between reverse field and the PIDVFs for registrations performed on the eight prostate image sets (I0,I1,…,I7). For the B-Spline DVFs, the reverse field is generated by running the DIR algorithm with reference and study images exchanged. SICLE autogenerates the reverse field. No points had inverse computing errors greater than 0.01 cm for these PIDVFs. The number of nonpositive Jacobians for the DVFs is also listed for each registration.

R and S B-Spline DVF SICLE DVFs
No. of nonpositive Jacobians Maximum difference (cm) Average difference (cm) No. of nonpositive Jacobians Maximum difference (cm) Average difference (cm)
I0 and I1 103 2.69 0.053 0 0.74 0.0068
I0 and I2 52 1.14 0.044 0 0.87 0.0069
I0 and I3 23 1.14 0.032 0 0.45 0.0075
I0 and I4 9 1.17 0.034 0 0.27 0.0081
I0 and I5 8 0.77 0.029 0 0.039 0.0022
I0 and I6 201 0.81 0.037 0 0.076 0.0082
I0 and I7 8 0.97 0.026 0 0.591 0.0052