Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 18;37(3):1117–1128. doi: 10.1118/1.3301594

Table 4.

B-Spline (B column) and SICLE (S column) back-and-forth dose mapping self-consistency comparison for DVFRS with DVFSR, DVFRS with PIDVFSR, and PIDVFRS with DVFSR mappings. The DVFs are generated for a set of prostate images (I0,I1,…,I7). The PIDVF approach has 1.5–2.5 times smaller deviations for B-Spline and similar performance for SICLE.

R and S Statistics of dose differences by DVFSR with DVFRS (cGy) Statistics of dose differences by PIDVFSR with DVFRS (cGy) Statistics of dose differences by DVFSR with PIDVFRS (cGy)
Maximum Average Maximum Average Maximum Average
B S B S B S B S B S B S
I0 and I1 952.0 200.6 35.6 17.8 254.1 213.2 15.6 15.5 223.1 208.1 14.6 17.5
I0 and I2 1055.5 187.9 42.7 14.5 168.4 184.9 20.4 17.1 149.1 186.1 20.4 18.5
I0 and I3 540.9 243.7 27.3 16.8 117.6 212.7 16.8 13.1 163.2 200.5 17.2 14.6
I0 and I4 719.9 197.5 32.0 16.6 178.8 198.2 18.3 15.8 153.7 187.4 17.8 15.9
I0 and I5 374.9 191.2 26.9 15.1 139.7 191.6 19.8 14.4 188.8 190.8 19.9 14.6
I0 and I6 349.3 268.8 25.0 16.5 343.7 268.5 14.6 18.1 262.3 255.6 14.4 15.4
I0 and I7 364.3 157.7 21.9 16.7 180.7 157.1 14.4 18.4 114.8 165.9 14.6 16.2