Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Hum Evol. 2008 Aug 19;55(4):682–690. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.03.010

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Graphs plotting trabecular thickness (top) and bone volume fractions (bottom) against slice thickness. Bone volume fractions (r = 0.191, p = 0.312) and anisotropy (data not shown; r = 0.337, p = 0.068) do not significantly increase with larger slice thicknesses. Regression analyses indicate that trabecular thickness significantly increases with slice thickness (r = 0.468, p = 0.009). Removal of Gorilla from the regression shows that the association is no longer significant (r = 0.379, p = 0.082).