Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr;45(2):532–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01080.x

Table 3.

Validation of Logistic Models Predicting High (Upper 10%) Expenditures in Year 2, MEPS Panels 5–8

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6 Model 7 Model 8 Model 9 Model 10
Correlation 0.347 0.446 0.454 0.423 0.405 0.473 0.454 0.466 0.480 0.464
c-statistic 0.791 0.835 0.849 0.824 0.816 0.854 0.837 0.852 0.857 0.842
Sensitivity (p>.1) 0.72 0.75 0.76 0.74 0.74 0.78 0.76 0.77 0.78 0.76
Positive predictive value 0.22 0.26 0.29 0.26 0.24 0.29 0.26 0.29 0.29 0.26
BIC −5,813 −8,748 −9,702 −7,911 −7,296 −10,051 −9,895 −8,884 −10,187 −9,119

Model 1 (baseline): age, gender, insurance, panel.

Model 2: Model 1+number of chronic conditions.

Model 3: Model 1+DCG categories.

Model 4: Model 1+key condition indicators.

Model 5: Model 1+perceived health and functioning.

Model 6: Model 1+number of chronic conditions+DCG categories.

Model 7: Model 1+number of chronic conditions+key condition indicators.

Model 8: Model 1+DCG categories+key condition indicators.

Model 9: Model 1+number of chronic conditions+DCG categories+perceived health and functioning.

Model 10: Model 1+number of chronic conditions+key condition indicators+perceived health and functioning.

BIC, Bayesian information criterion; DCG, diagnostic cost group; MEPS, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.