Skip to main content
. 2004 Nov 15;2(4):153–160. doi: 10.1186/1897-4287-2-4-153

Table 1.

Indications and advantages of colectomy options in patients with FAP

Total colectomy + ileorectal anastomosis Restorative panproctocolectomy
Indications • Rectal sparing • Rectal cancer
• Sparse polyposis • Multiple rectal polyps
• Compliant with follow-up • Widespread colorectal polyps
• Non-compliant with follow-up

Advantages • Less operative morbidity • ⇓ Rectal cancer risk
• Larger reservoir function • Less frequent surveillance

Disadvantages • ⇑ Rectal cancer risk • Longer procedure
• Rectal surveillance every 6 months • Greater complication rate
• IPAA or ileostomy may be required at a later date • Likely two-stage procedure
• Poorer functional outcome