Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 16;107(9):4242–4247. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911637107

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Graphical representation of equilibrium abundances, Inline graphic (AC), and conditions for coexistence and invasion (DF) in the tolerance–fecundity model, for different numbers of species. Here species 1 (black) has lowest fecundity and highest habitat stress tolerance (the proportion of habitat in which it can recruit), species 2 (gray) has higher fecundity and lower stress tolerance, species 3 (lighter gray, if present) has still higher fecundity and lower stress tolerance, and so forth. When expressed as the proportion of total area occupied, the equilibrium abundances sum (or “stack”) to Inline graphic (stacked bars in AC). The point at which a line drawn from Inline graphic through Inline graphic intersects the y axis determines the division between Inline graphic and Inline graphic (AC). Similarly, the division between Inline graphic and Inline graphic is defined by the line drawn from Inline graphic through Inline graphic and on to the y axis (B and C). Coexistence is possible only if these lines intersect the y axis at a Inline graphic, a condition met if Inline graphic, and if the lines do not cross, which requires Inline graphic Inline graphic. The fate of a new species with parameter values f and h introduced into a community depends on its position relative to the curved lines that define these two sets of conditions for the resident species, distinguished here by thin and thick lines, respectively, as well as on its position relative to the horizontal line Inline graphic (DF). All these lines are omitted where they do not influence invader fate. Depending on the parameter combination, the invader may be able to invade and coexist with all residents (“coexists” or simply “c”), be unable to invade and thus be excluded (“excluded”), or invade and displace one or more residents (“displaces sp. 1”, etc.).