Table 2.
Univariate Probit Estimation of Perceived Harassment
| Variable | Model A | Model B |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Harassment | ||
| Offensive Joking | .352* | .348* |
| (.138) | (.138) | |
| Personal Questions | −.061 | −.063 |
| (.141) | (.141) | |
| Invasion of Space | .443** | .453** |
| (.147) | (.147) | |
| Unwanted Touching | .625** | .620** |
| (.197) | (.198) | |
| Offensive Materials | .140 | .140 |
| (.214) | (.215) | |
| Physical Assault | .751* | .793* |
| (.369) | (.380) | |
| Total High School | .127* | .131* |
| Harassment | (.053) | (.053) |
| Individual-level | ||
| Male | −.577** | −.654** |
| (.127) | (.195) | |
| Self-efficacy | .021 | .018 |
| (.026) | (.026) | |
| Education | .081# | .074# |
| (.043) | (.044) | |
| Religiosity | .098 | .091 |
| (.067) | (.067) | |
| Financial Problems | −.028 | −.037 |
| (.128) | (.129) | |
| Other Discrimination | .425** | .488* |
| (.156) | (.198) | |
| Other Discrimination*Male | −.136 | |
| (.316) | ||
| Work Characteristics | ||
| Work Hours | .004 | .004 |
| (.005) | (.005) | |
| Work Friends | −.082 | −.085 |
| (.057) | (.057) | |
| Workplace Training | .302# | .315# |
| (.182) | (.183) | |
| Supervisor Listens | .073 | .075 |
| (.072) | (.073) | |
| Supervise Others | −.132 | −.133 |
| (.171) | (.171) | |
| Restaurant Industry | −.126 | −.058 |
| (.124) | (.151) | |
| Restaurant*Male | −.196 | |
| (.262) | ||
| Sales Industry | −.207# | −.346* |
| (.120) | (.145) | |
| Sales*Male | .426# | |
| (.251) | ||
| Intercept | −2.169** | −2.077** |
| (.593) | (.580) | |
| Number of cases | 705 | 705 |
| Log-Likelihood | −311.770 | −309.869 |
| Chi-Squared | 153.02** | 156.82** |
#
p < .10
*
p < .05
**
p < .01
Note: Standard errors in parentheses